florence: were central in development of renaissance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.57
, location
Weight: 0.56
, friend
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.35
, fred
Weight: 0.34
, andrea
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were central in development of renaissance 1.00
was important in renaissance 0.91
were central in development 0.90
was important to rebirth of renaissance 0.88
was heart of renaissance 0.87
was at heart renaissance 0.87
be birthplace of renaissance 0.85
was important to rebirth 0.83
was called cradle of renaissance 0.82
be considered cradle of renaissance 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(florence, was at heart renaissance)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florence, was important in renaissance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(florence, were central in development)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florence, was important to rebirth of renaissance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(florence, was heart of renaissance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(florence, was heart of renaissance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(florence, were central in development)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florence, be birthplace of renaissance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(florence, was at heart renaissance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(florence, was called cradle of renaissance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(florence, was important to rebirth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(florence, be considered cradle of renaissance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(florence, was called cradle of renaissance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(florence, be considered cradle of renaissance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(florence, was heart of renaissance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(florence, was heart of renaissance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(florence, were central in development)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(florence, were central in development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(florence, was called cradle of renaissance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(florence, was at heart renaissance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(florence, was called cradle of renaissance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(florence, be considered cradle of renaissance)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(florence, was important in renaissance)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(florence, be birthplace of renaissance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(florence, was important to rebirth of renaissance)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(florence, was at heart renaissance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(florence, was important to rebirth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(florence, was important in renaissance)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(florence, be birthplace of renaissance)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(florence, be considered cradle of renaissance)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(florence, was important to rebirth of renaissance)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(florence, was important to rebirth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(florence, was important in renaissance)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(florence, be birthplace of renaissance)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(florence, was important to rebirth of renaissance)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(florence, was important to rebirth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(florence, were central in development of renaissance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(florence, were central in development of renaissance)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(florence, were central in development of renaissance)