florida: be target for earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north carolina
Weight: 0.71
, california
Weight: 0.70
, south carolina
Weight: 0.70
, ohio
Weight: 0.69
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.62
, georgia
Weight: 0.62
, tennessee
Weight: 0.61
, indiana
Weight: 0.58
, spoonbill
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be target for earthquakes 1.00
have less earthquakes than california 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(georgia, have less earthquakes than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(florida, be target for earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(florida, have less earthquakes than california)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(florida, have less earthquakes than california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(florida, be target for earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(florida, be target for earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(florida, be target for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(georgia, have less earthquakes than california)