florist: cut stems diagonally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.63
, wedding
Weight: 0.53
, family member
Weight: 0.50
, store
Weight: 0.49
, professional
Weight: 0.49
Siblings barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, beauty salon
Weight: 0.34
, bakery
Weight: 0.33
, department store
Weight: 0.33
, jeweler
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut stems diagonally 1.00
cut diagonally flowers 0.89
cut stems 0.86
cut flowers at angle 0.79
cut at angle 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(florist, cut stems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(florist, cut stems)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(florist, cut stems)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(florist, cut stems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(florist, cut diagonally flowers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(florist, cut diagonally flowers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(florist, cut at angle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(florist, cut at angle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(florist, cut flowers at angle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(florist, cut diagonally flowers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(florist, cut diagonally flowers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(florist, cut flowers at angle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(florist, cut flowers at angle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(florist, cut at angle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(florist, cut at angle)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(florist, cut flowers at angle)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(florist, cut at angle)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(florist, cut at angle)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(florist, cut at angle)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(florist, cut at angle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(florist, cut stems diagonally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florist, cut stems diagonally)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(florist, cut stems diagonally)