flower arrangement: be at table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents decoration
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, detail
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bouquet
Weight: 0.73
, teddy bear
Weight: 0.66
, flower
Weight: 0.37
, vase
Weight: 0.34
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table 1.00
be at on table 0.98
be nice table decoration 0.81
be use to decorate table 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(flower, be at table)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vase, be at table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vase, be at on table)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(flower, be nice table decoration)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(flower, be use to decorate table)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vase, be at on table)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vase, be at on table)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vase, be at table)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vase, be at table)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(flower, be at table)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(flower, be at table)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(flower, be nice table decoration)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(flower, be nice table decoration)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(flower, be use to decorate table)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(flower, be use to decorate table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(flower arrangement, be at table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(flower arrangement, be at table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vase, be at table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(vase, be at on table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(flower, be at table)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(flower, be nice table decoration)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flower arrangement, be at table)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(flower, be use to decorate table)