flower: attract pollinators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motif
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.64
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.63
, token
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aster
Weight: 0.77
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.76
, hyacinth
Weight: 0.76
, daisy
Weight: 0.75
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
attract pollinators 1.00
help in pollination 0.81
need pollination 0.81
pollinate 0.81
be important to bees 0.80
pollinated by insects 0.80
help bees 0.80
avoid self pollination 0.79
need bees 0.79
be pollinated by birds 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hibiscus, pollinate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hibiscus, pollinate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hibiscus, pollinate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(flower, attract pollinators)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important to bees)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(flower, need bees)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(flower, need bees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(flower, be important to bees)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(flower, need bees)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(flower, be important to bees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(flower, need bees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(flower, be important to bees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flower, attract pollinators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(flower, attract pollinators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flower, attract pollinators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hibiscus, pollinate)