flower: be aranged in floral pattern

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, token
Weight: 0.58
, vine
Weight: 0.58
, matter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aster
Weight: 0.77
, daisy
Weight: 0.75
, pansy
Weight: 0.70
, tulip
Weight: 0.70
, lily
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be aranged in floral pattern 1.00
be a part of flower 0.82
be at flower garden 0.81
has colorful petal 0.78
be display in vase 0.75
be nice in vase 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lily, be a part of flower)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lily, be a part of flower)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lily, be a part of flower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flower, be at flower garden)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(flower, be display in vase)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(flower, be nice in vase)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(flower, has colorful petal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(flower, be display in vase)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(flower, has colorful petal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(flower, be nice in vase)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(flower, be nice in vase)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(flower, be display in vase)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(flower, be nice in vase)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(flower, be display in vase)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(flower, has colorful petal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(flower, has colorful petal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(flower, be at flower garden)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flower, be at flower garden)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(flower, be at flower garden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(flower, be aranged in floral pattern)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lily, be a part of flower)