flower: have scents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motif
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.64
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.63
, token
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aster
Weight: 0.77
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.76
, hyacinth
Weight: 0.76
, daisy
Weight: 0.75
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
have scents 1.00
give out fragrance 0.83
emit aroma 0.82
have smells 0.81
have odors 0.80
is scented 0.79
have smell 0.79
smell 0.78
have sweet smell 0.78
is fragrant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(daisy, smell)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(daisy, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(daisy, smell)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(flower, have scents)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(flower, have odors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(flower, smell)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(flower, have odors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(flower, smell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(flower, have odors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(flower, have odors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(flower, smell)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(flower, smell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(flower, have scents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(flower, have scents)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(flower, have scents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(daisy, smell)