flu: has state disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.67
, illness
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, vaccination
Weight: 0.63
, virus
Weight: 0.62
Siblings influenza
Weight: 0.39
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.37
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.37
, mumps
Weight: 0.37
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state disease 1.00
has state virus 0.84
is highly infectious disease 0.81
has state sepsis 0.78
is epidemic 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(flu, has state disease)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mumps, has state disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(flu, has state disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mumps, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mumps, has state disease)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state virus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(flu, has state disease)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(flu, has state virus)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(flu, is epidemic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(flu, is highly infectious disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(flu, is epidemic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state virus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(flu, is epidemic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(flu, has state virus)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(flu, has state virus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(flu, is highly infectious disease)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(flu, is highly infectious disease)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(flu, is highly infectious disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(flu, is epidemic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(flu, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mumps, has state disease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(influenza, has state disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(influenza, has state virus)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)