fly: be attract to rotten vegetable

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.61
, flight
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.56
, song
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wasp
Weight: 0.49
, lure
Weight: 0.47
, moth
Weight: 0.32
, lizard
Weight: 0.32
, dolphin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attract to rotten vegetable 1.00
be use in fish to attract fish 0.76
be used to attract duck 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lure, be used to attract duck)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lure, be use in fish to attract fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lure, be use in fish to attract fish)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lure, be use in fish to attract fish)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lure, be used to attract duck)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lure, be used to attract duck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lure, be use in fish to attract fish)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fly, be attract to rotten vegetable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lure, be used to attract duck)