foam: be good material use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good material use 1.00
is good material 0.97
is material 0.92
be considered material 0.90
stick to material 0.86
differ from material 0.83
be considered composite material 0.82
is great molding material 0.82
is good insulating material 0.81
is composite material 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(material, stick to material)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(foam, be good material use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(material, stick to material)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(material, stick to material)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is composite material)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be considered composite material)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great molding material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be considered material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(material, stick to material)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(foam, be good material use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(styrofoam, is material)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is material)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fiberglass, is material)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good material)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fiberglass, be considered material)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be considered material)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fiberglass, is composite material)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is composite material)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be considered composite material)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be considered composite material)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(silicone, is great molding material)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(silicone, is great molding material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(foam, be good material use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(foam, be good material use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(material, stick to material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is material)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is composite material)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is material)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be considered composite material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(silicone, is great molding material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be considered material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(foam, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(material, stick to material)