foam: be poor conductor of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor conductor of heat 1.00
be poor conductor of energy 0.93
be poor conductor of thermal energy 0.88
is good conductors 0.82
is good heat 0.80
is conductors 0.80
be different from conductors 0.80
have heat capacitys 0.80
is heat 0.80
be good insulator for heat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(material, be different from conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(material, be different from conductors)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(material, is conductors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(material, be different from conductors)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(material, is conductors)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(material, be different from conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is heat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(material, be different from conductors)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(material, be different from conductors)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)