foam: be poor conductor of thermal energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor conductor of thermal energy 1.00
be poor conductor of energy 0.91
be poor conductor of heat 0.88
have low thermal conductivity 0.85
have thermal conductivity 0.84
is good conductors 0.78
be different from conductors 0.77
have good heat insulators glass 0.77
is energy 0.77
is conductors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(material, be different from conductors)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(surface, is energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(surface, is energy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(material, be different from conductors)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(material, is conductors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(material, be different from conductors)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(material, is conductors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(surface, is energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(material, be different from conductors)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(surface, is energy)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of heat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of heat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(surface, is energy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(material, be different from conductors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(surface, is energy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(material, be different from conductors)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)