foam: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be of quality 0.86
has quality use 0.86
has quality making 0.83
is good insulater 0.83
be of high quality 0.82
be good for modelling 0.81
has quality cost 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(filler, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(filler, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(filler, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(latex, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(filler, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(silicone, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(latex, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(latex, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(foam, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(foam, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulater)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulater)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulater)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(filler, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(silicone, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(latex, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(filler, has quality bad)