foam: have low thermal conductivity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low thermal conductivity 1.00
have thermal conductivity 0.99
have low conductivity 0.95
have conductivity 0.93
be poor conductor of thermal energy 0.85
is conductive 0.81
is paramagnetic 0.80
is heat insulator 0.79
be good insulator of heat 0.79
is good heat insulator 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fiberglass, is heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(foam, have conductivity)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(foam, have conductivity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foam, have thermal conductivity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low conductivity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(foam, have conductivity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(foam, have low conductivity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(foam, have conductivity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(foam, have low conductivity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, have low conductivity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, be poor conductor of thermal energy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(foam, have low thermal conductivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foam, have low thermal conductivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)