foil: be bad for microwaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum foil
Weight: 0.67
, form
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.53
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.33
, raw material
Weight: 0.32
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for microwaves 1.00
burn in microwave 0.78
explode in microwave 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(aluminum foil, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(aluminum foil, burn in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(aluminum foil, burn in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(aluminum foil, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(foil, be bad for microwaves)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(foil, explode in microwave)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(foil, explode in microwave)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(foil, burn in microwave)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(foil, burn in microwave)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(foil, burn in microwave)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(foil, explode in microwave)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(foil, burn in microwave)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(foil, explode in microwave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(foil, be bad for microwaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)