folder: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents directory
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.57
, web page
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.55
Siblings archive
Weight: 0.58
, bin
Weight: 0.55
, junk
Weight: 0.49
, file
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be good for environment 0.80
is food good 0.78
is larden bad 0.78
has quality evil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(junk, is food good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bin, is larden bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bin, has quality evil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bin, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bin, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bin, be good for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(junk, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(junk, is food good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(bin, is larden bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bin, is larden bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bin, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bin, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(folder, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(folder, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(junk, is food good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bin, is larden bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bin, be good for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(folder, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bin, has quality evil)