follower: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, character
Weight: 0.55
, group
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.33
, philosopher
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32
, religious leader
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
has quality plus 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(follower, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(follower, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(follower, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(follower, has quality plus)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(follower, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(follower, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(follower, has quality plus)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(follower, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(follower, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(follower, has quality plus)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(follower, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(follower, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(follower, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(follower, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(follower, has quality plus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(follower, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(follower, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(follower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)