food can: be used to have lunch

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.66
, container
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.37
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, kosher food
Weight: 0.35
, garbage can
Weight: 0.35
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to have lunch 1.00
be used to quick lunch 0.89
be used to purchase and eat quick meal 0.81
be used to eat food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to quick lunch)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to purchase and eat quick meal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to eat food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to quick lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to quick lunch)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to purchase and eat quick meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to purchase and eat quick meal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to eat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to eat food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(food can, be used to have lunch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food can, be used to have lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to eat food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to purchase and eat quick meal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to quick lunch)