food can: be used to transport food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.66
, container
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.37
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, kosher food
Weight: 0.35
, garbage can
Weight: 0.35
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to transport food 1.00
be at food 0.83
be used to eat food 0.81
be used to food storage 0.80
be used to store food 0.78
be used to ease in transportation 0.78
be used to fast food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, be used to ease in transportation)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(container, be at food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(container, be used to food storage)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food can, be used to transport food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(container, be at food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(container, be used to food storage)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(container, be used to ease in transportation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(container, be at food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(container, be used to food storage)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(container, be used to ease in transportation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to eat food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to fast food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, be used to ease in transportation)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(container, be at food)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(container, be used to food storage)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to eat food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food chain, be used to fast food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be used to fast food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(food can, be used to transport food)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(food can, be used to store food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(food can, be used to store food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food can, be used to store food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to store food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food can, be used to transport food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(container, be used to ease in transportation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(container, be used to food storage)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(container, be at food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to eat food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be used to fast food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(container, be used to ease in transportation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(container, be used to food storage)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(food can, be used to transport food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(container, be at food)