food chain: be necessary for survival of animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary for survival of animals 1.00
have necessary 0.78
is necessary 0.78
be important to humans 0.77
show animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, is necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food chain, have necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, show animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(food chain, show animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food chain, is necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(food chain, show animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(food chain, be important to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(food chain, is necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(food chain, have necessary)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(food chain, be important to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(food chain, be important to humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food chain, show animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be important to humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)