food chain: be vs food web

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs food web 1.00
be vs food 0.92
form food web 0.86
be different than food web 0.85
differ from food web 0.82
have similar web 0.81
has physical part web 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(food chain, be vs food web)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(concept, has physical part web)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concept, has physical part web)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(food chain, be vs food web)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(food chain, be vs food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be vs food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, be different than food web)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(food chain, form food web)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, differ from food web)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be different than food web)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(food chain, form food web)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, differ from food web)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food chain, be vs food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have similar web)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(food chain, be different than food web)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(food chain, differ from food web)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(food chain, form food web)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(food chain, form food web)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(food chain, be vs food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(food chain, differ from food web)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food chain, be different than food web)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(food chain, have similar web)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(food chain, have similar web)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(food chain, have similar web)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(food chain, be vs food web)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)