food chain: go out of business

Related concepts

Parents	concept Weight: 0.62 , chain Weight: 0.61 , thing Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.59
Siblings	taco bell Weight: 0.70 , restaurant Weight: 0.69 , mcdonalds Weight: 0.66 , mcdonald Weight: 0.65 , supermarket Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
go out of business	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, go out of business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(restaurant, go out of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(food chain, go out of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(food chain, go out of business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(food chain, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(food chain, go out of business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)