food chain: have necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have necessary 1.00
is necessary 0.97
be necessary for survival of animals 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food chain, have necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food chain, have necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(food chain, have necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(food chain, have necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, is necessary)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food chain, is necessary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(food chain, is necessary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food chain, have necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(food chain, have necessary)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)