food store: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.86
, store
Weight: 0.68
, restaurant
Weight: 0.67
, shop
Weight: 0.65
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.82
, supermarket
Weight: 0.71
, pharmacy
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.39
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at saginaw michigan 1.00
be at michigan 1.00
be at florida 0.85
be at america 0.81
be at texas 0.80
be at every part of america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(food store, be at michigan)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(store, be at every part of america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(food store, be at michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(store, be at texas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(store, be at every part of america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(store, be at texas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(store, be at every part of america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(food store, be at michigan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(store, be at every part of america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(food store, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(food store, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(food store, be at saginaw michigan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(food store, be at saginaw michigan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at saginaw michigan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(food store, be at saginaw michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(food store, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(store, be at every part of america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(store, be at every part of america)