food: be at bowl

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bowl 1.00
be at bowl alley 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(alcoholic beverage, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(food, be at bowl)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(alcoholic beverage, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be at bowl alley)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(food, be at bowl)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl alley)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(food, be at bowl alley)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(food, be at bowl alley)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl alley)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(alcoholic beverage, be at bowl alley)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(food, be at bowl)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)