food: be at can

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at can 1.00
has food that be in can 0.87
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.81
be can in jar 0.81
be need to process anything 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grocery store, has food that be in can)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food, be at can)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fuel, be need to process anything)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food, be at can)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grocery store, has food that be in can)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fuel, be need to process anything)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be need to process anything)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, has food that be in can)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grocery store, has food that be in can)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(food, be at can)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fuel, be need to process anything)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(food, be at can)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(food, be at can)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(food, be at can)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food, be at can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grocery store, has food that be in can)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fuel, be need to process anything)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grocery store, has food that be in can)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(food, be at can)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fuel, be need to process anything)