food: be at dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dinner 1.00
be make into dinner 0.90
be used to lunch 0.84
be at dine room 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food, be used to lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to lunch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to lunch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food, be used to lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be at dinner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(food, be at dinner)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(food, be at dine room)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to lunch)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to lunch)