food: be like pizza

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, meat pie
Weight: 0.76
, wild rice
Weight: 0.75
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like pizza 1.00
get to restaurant 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be like pizza)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, be like pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(food, be like pizza)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(food, get to restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, get to restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(food, get to restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, get to restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be like pizza)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be like pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)