food: taste different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, meat pie
Weight: 0.76
, wild rice
Weight: 0.75
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste different 1.00
taste different to people 0.96
taste different to different people 0.95
have taste 0.94
taste same 0.94
taste good 0.93
get taste 0.92
suddenly taste different 0.92
taste bad 0.92
taste better day 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pet food, get taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pet food, get taste)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pet food, get taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(food, taste different)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(food, taste different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, have taste)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(food, have taste)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(food, have taste)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(food, have taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pet food, get taste)