foot: be used to stand on

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.61
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, height
Weight: 0.59
Siblings big toe
Weight: 0.60
, toe
Weight: 0.57
, blister
Weight: 0.53
, heel
Weight: 0.50
, skate
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to stand on 1.00
be used to stand 0.97
requires put them on 0.80
be used to walk on 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skate, requires put them on)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skate, requires put them on)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(skate, requires put them on)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(foot, be used to stand on)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(foot, be used to stand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to stand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(foot, be used to stand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(foot, be used to walk on)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(foot, be used to walk on)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(foot, be used to stand)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(foot, be used to walk on)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to walk on)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to stand on)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(foot, be used to stand on)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to stand on)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(skate, requires put them on)