football team: have stupid team names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.73
, team
Weight: 0.72
, athletics
Weight: 0.68
Siblings baseball team
Weight: 0.81
, starter
Weight: 0.51
, professional football
Weight: 0.40
, football field
Weight: 0.40
, football
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have stupid team names 1.00
have team names 0.91
have names 0.84
have similar names 0.81
have albion in name 0.78
have many players 0.78
have 11 players 0.76
have players 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(baseball team, have names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(baseball team, have names)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(baseball team, have names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(football team, have stupid team names)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(football team, have team names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(football team, have names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(football team, have team names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(football team, have players)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(football team, have similar names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(football team, have team names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(football team, have many players)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(football team, have albion in name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(football team, have albion in name)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(football team, have players)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(football team, have albion in name)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(football team, have names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(football team, have names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(football team, have similar names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(football team, have many players)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(football team, have players)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(football team, have 11 players)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(football team, have similar names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(football team, have albion in name)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(football team, have many players)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(football team, have 11 players)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(football team, have 11 players)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(football team, have 11 players)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(football team, have team names)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(football team, have names)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(football team, have similar names)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(football team, have many players)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(football team, have players)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(football team, have stupid team names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(football team, have stupid team names)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(baseball team, have names)