ford: be more expensive than chevy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than chevy 1.00
be better than chevy 0.95
is more expensive 0.82
be cheaper than chevys 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ford, be more expensive than chevy)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ford, be better than chevy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than chevy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than chevy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ford, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ford, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ford, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ford, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ford, be more expensive than chevy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ford, be more expensive than chevy)