:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is car)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is cars)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(porsche, is car)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ford, is bad car)
Similarity expansion
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ford, is car)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ford, is car)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ford, is car)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ford, is cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ford, make cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ford, drop cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ford, drop cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, is cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ford, drop cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ford, cut cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ford, make cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, make cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ford, cut cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ford, cut cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ford, is cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ford, drop cars)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ford, cut cars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ford, making cars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ford, make cars)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, is cars)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ford, is bad car)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(volvo, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(porsche, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mustang, is car)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mustang, is cars)