ford: is bad car

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, buick
Weight: 0.34
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad car 1.00
is car 0.94
is bad cars 0.92
is cars 0.83
make cars 0.81
do away with cars 0.81
make two cars 0.79
making cars 0.78
drop cars 0.78
cut cars 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is car)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is cars)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(porsche, is car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(volvo, is car)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(volvo, is car)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mustang, is car)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mustang, is car)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(porsche, is car)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(porsche, is car)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mustang, is cars)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mustang, is cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ford, is bad car)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ford, is car)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ford, is car)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ford, is car)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ford, is cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ford, is bad cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ford, make two cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ford, make cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ford, drop cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ford, drop cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, is cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ford, make two cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ford, drop cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ford, cut cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ford, making cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(ford, make two cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ford, making cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ford, make cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, make cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ford, cut cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ford, making cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ford, cut cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ford, is cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ford, do away with cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ford, drop cars)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ford, cut cars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ford, is bad cars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ford, making cars)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ford, do away with cars)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ford, do away with cars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ford, make cars)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ford, make two cars)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ford, do away with cars)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, is cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ford, is bad car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(volvo, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(porsche, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mustang, is car)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mustang, is cars)