ford: is good company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good company 1.00
is bad company 0.96
has state company 0.88
be good stock buy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(porsche, has state company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(porsche, has state company)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(porsche, has state company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ford, is good company)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ford, is bad company)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ford, is bad company)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ford, is bad company)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ford, has state company)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ford, has state company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ford, has state company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ford, has state company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ford, be good stock buy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ford, be good stock buy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ford, be good stock buy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ford, be good stock buy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ford, is good company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ford, is good company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ford, is good company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(porsche, has state company)