forest: be at south america

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, resource
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timber
Weight: 0.35
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.33
, natural gas
Weight: 0.32
, wood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at south america 1.00
be at northeast 0.77
be at california 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wood, be at northeast)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wood, be at northeast)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wood, be at northeast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(forest, be at south america)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(forest, be at california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(forest, be at california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(forest, be at california)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be at california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(forest, be at south america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(forest, be at south america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(forest, be at south america)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wood, be at northeast)