forest: be important in wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in wildlife 1.00
protect wildlife 0.94
act as habitat for wildlife 0.93
act as natural habitat for wildlife 0.92
be called natural habitat 0.83
act as natural habitat 0.82
be called habitat 0.81
act as habitat 0.80
have biodiversity 0.80
has quality biodiversity 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(forest, be important in wildlife)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(forest, protect wildlife)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(forest, act as natural habitat for wildlife)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(forest, protect wildlife)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(forest, act as natural habitat for wildlife)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(forest, protect wildlife)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(forest, act as natural habitat for wildlife)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(forest, protect wildlife)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(forest, act as natural habitat for wildlife)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important in wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(forest, be important in wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(forest, be important in wildlife)