forest: be important to human beings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to human beings 1.00
be important for human beings 1.00
be very important to human beings 0.97
be useful to human beings 0.97
be related to human beings 0.97
be useful for human beings 0.97
be important to beings 0.97
be important for beings 0.96
be helpful to human beings 0.96
be related to beings 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(forest, be important to human beings)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(forest, be related to human beings)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(forest, be related to human beings)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(forest, be related to human beings)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(forest, be related to human beings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important to human beings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(forest, be important to human beings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(forest, be important to human beings)