forest: be pretty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, resource
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timber
Weight: 0.35
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.33
, natural gas
Weight: 0.32
, wood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pretty 1.00
be very pretty 0.98
be used to make thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(forest, be pretty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scenery, be very pretty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used to make thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(forest, be pretty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wood, be used to make thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(wood, be used to make thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(forest, be pretty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be pretty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(forest, be pretty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scenery, be very pretty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wood, be used to make thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(forest, be pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scenery, be very pretty)