forester: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.53
, position
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.50
, model
Weight: 0.49
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.32
, fireman
Weight: 0.32
, supervisor
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, legislator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality price 0.81
is xt worth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fireman, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fireman, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(supervisor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(forester, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality price)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(forester, is xt worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(forester, is xt worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(forester, is xt worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(forester, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(forester, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(forester, has quality price)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(forester, is xt worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(forester, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(forester, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(forester, has quality price)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(forester, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(forester, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(forester, has quality price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(forester, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fireman, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(supervisor, has quality good)