forester: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.53
, position
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.50
, model
Weight: 0.49
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.32
, fireman
Weight: 0.32
, supervisor
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, legislator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(model, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forester, is hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(model, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(model, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(model, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(forester, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(policeman, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(policeman, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(forester, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(forester, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forester, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(model, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(policeman, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(forester, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(model, is hot)