fork: be used to divide road in two

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34
, razor blade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to divide road in two 1.00
be in road 0.84
be find in road 0.83
be at road 0.83
be at fork in road 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at fork in road)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(spoon, be at fork in road) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at fork in road)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fork, be used to divide road in two)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fork, be in road)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fork, be in road)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fork, be find in road)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fork, be find in road)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fork, be at road)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fork, be find in road)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fork, be at road)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fork, be in road)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fork, be at road)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fork, be at road)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fork, be find in road)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fork, be in road)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fork, be used to divide road in two)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(spoon, be at fork in road)