fork: keep champagne fresh

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tuning fork
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep champagne fresh 1.00
keep champagne fizzy 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(spoon, keep champagne fresh)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spoon, keep champagne fizzy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(spoon, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(spoon, keep champagne fresh)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spoon, keep champagne fizzy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(spoon, keep champagne fizzy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fork, keep champagne fresh)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fork, keep champagne fizzy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fork, keep champagne fizzy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fizzy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fork, keep champagne fizzy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fresh)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fork, keep champagne fresh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(spoon, keep champagne fresh)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fork, keep champagne fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(spoon, keep champagne fizzy)