form: be common among layman

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common among layman 1.00
be in common 0.79
is 16 common 0.79
is 16 common with 48 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(factor, is 16 common with 48) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(form, be common among layman)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(factor, be in common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(form, be common among layman)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(factor, be in common)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(factor, is 16 common with 48)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(factor, is 16 common with 48)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factor, be in common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(factor, is 16 common with 48) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, be common among layman)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(factor, be in common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, be common among layman)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(form, be common among layman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(form, be common among layman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(form, be common among layman)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be in common)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(factor, is 16 common with 48)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be in common)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(form, be common among layman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(factor, is 16 common with 48)