form: be detrimental to group

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be detrimental to group 1.00
be detrimental 0.96
be detrimental to group of organisms 0.91
is beneficial 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(form, be detrimental to group)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(form, be detrimental)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(form, be detrimental)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(form, be detrimental to group of organisms)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, be detrimental)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(form, be detrimental to group of organisms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(form, be detrimental to group of organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(form, be detrimental)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(form, be detrimental to group of organisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(form, be detrimental to group)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be detrimental to group)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(form, be detrimental to group)