form: be in animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in animals 1.00
be in humans 0.80
more than dog food 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(way, more than dog food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(form, be in animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(way, more than dog food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(way, more than dog food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(way, more than dog food)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(form, be in animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(form, be in animals)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(form, be in humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(form, be in humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(form, be in humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(form, be in humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(form, be in animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(form, be in animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(way, more than dog food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(form, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(way, more than dog food)