formaldehyde: be more reactive than benzaldehyde

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.67
, chemical
Weight: 0.66
, chemical compound
Weight: 0.65
, agent
Weight: 0.60
, voc
Weight: 0.60
Siblings paraformaldehyde
Weight: 0.39
, benzene
Weight: 0.37
, arsenic
Weight: 0.36
, sulfur dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, botulinum toxin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reactive than benzaldehyde 1.00
be less reactive than ethene 0.93
be less reactive than alkenes 0.93
be more reactive than alkanes 0.92
be less reactive than cyclohexatriene 0.92
be less reactive than cyclohexene 0.92
is less reactive 0.91
be less reactive with electrophiles 0.91
is reactive 0.89
be more acidic than cyclohexane 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive with electrophiles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexene)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexatriene)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than ethene)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than alkenes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be more reactive than alkanes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(benzene, be more acidic than cyclohexane)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive with electrophiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(benzene, be less reactive with electrophiles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(benzene, be more reactive than alkanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(benzene, be more reactive than alkanes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than alkenes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(benzene, be less reactive than alkenes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(benzene, be more acidic than cyclohexane) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(benzene, be more acidic than cyclohexane)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexene)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexatriene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexatriene)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(benzene, be less reactive than ethene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(benzene, be less reactive than ethene)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(benzene, be less reactive with electrophiles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(benzene, be more reactive than alkanes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(benzene, be less reactive than alkenes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexene)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(benzene, be less reactive than cyclohexatriene)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(benzene, be less reactive than ethene)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(formaldehyde, be more reactive than benzaldehyde) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(benzene, be more acidic than cyclohexane)