formation: be in grand canyon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in grand canyon 1.00
be in grand canyon changing 0.95
be in canyon 0.92
be in canyon changing 0.87
were grand 0.81
were built in valley 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(formation, be in grand canyon)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(formation, be in canyon)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(formation, be in canyon)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(formation, be in canyon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in canyon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in canyon changing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(formation, be in grand canyon)