formation: serve as model for cloud formation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
serve as model for cloud formation 1.00
serve as model 0.86
be used model 0.78
be in clouds 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(function, be used model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shape, be in clouds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shape, be in clouds)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(function, be used model)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shape, be in clouds)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be used model)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(trigonometric function, be used model)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(function, be used model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shape, be in clouds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(trigonometric function, be used model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(trigonometric function, be used model)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(formation, serve as model)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(formation, serve as model)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(formation, serve as model)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(shape, be in clouds)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(function, be used model)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(trigonometric function, be used model)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(shape, be in clouds)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(formation, serve as model for cloud formation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(function, be used model)