foundation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents framework
Weight: 0.71
, supporter
Weight: 0.63
, source
Weight: 0.62
, organization
Weight: 0.62
Siblings donor
Weight: 0.59
, broad
Weight: 0.53
, abbey
Weight: 0.47
, institute
Weight: 0.33
, charity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality evil 0.80
has quality systems 0.78
hate poor 0.76
hate global poor 0.75
is good thing 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(framework, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(foundation, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(foundation, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(foundation, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(foundation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(charity, hate poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(charity, hate global poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality evil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(charity, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(framework, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foundation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foundation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foundation, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foundation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(charity, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(institute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(charity, hate poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(charity, hate poor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(charity, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(charity, hate global poor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(charity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(charity, is good thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(institute, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(foundation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(foundation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(framework, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(charity, hate poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(charity, hate global poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(charity, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(institute, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(framework, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(foundation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)