fox: be at field forest and in den

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at field forest and in den 1.00
be at forest 0.84
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.78
be at meadow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at meadow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at meadow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fox, be at meadow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fox, be at meadow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fox, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fox, be at meadow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at meadow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at meadow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)